Thursday, November 26, 2020

The Value of a Print



A pigment inkjet print on fine art paper.

© PN Parsons







Beyond the occasional Mama Mamiya blog post there is also my desire to produce a fine black and white print. A print that has value well beyond its production cost. A photographic image which can be framed and hung on a wall, given as a gift or if I'm really lucky can be sold. The fine print is considered the cumulation of one's efforts.

Producing work which reflects one's vision and creates a feeling of satisfaction also requires diligence and care. To quote David Bayles and Ted Orland in their book Art & fear, "Vision is always ahead of execution, knowledge of materials is your contact with reality and uncertainty a virtue."

Renowned American photographer Ansel Adams (1902-1984) is quoted to have said something akin to 'anything which is easy to produce often has little value.' 

Using an 8x10 view camera Adams is best known for scenes of western United States. He was no doubt reflecting on the major effort required to create a fine image, where the value of the print itself often reflects the artistic vision, skill and tenacity of the photographer.

One way to reach that feeling of artistic accomplishment and to create a fine print (the end goal) is to have a consistent work flow. 

To that end a consistent work flow is perhaps the best way to make fine images. A work flow which has a specific goal and avoids a willy-nilly random approach to creative photography.

Producing a collection of negatives has for me become an ongoing practice. It is better to be out there shooting consistently than waiting for a worthy subject to appear. Just shooting with the TLR often can be rewarding enough. The end goal of the making of a print can be put off until actual photographs are needed. 

In my work I use the Mamiya C220 TLR system. I avoid experimenting with different film, oddball developers, plastic cameras and gadgets and use Ilford HP5 film and Kodak D-76 (diluted1:1) as my developer and Kodak powder fixer. The primary photography focus is the subject. This is what I like doing. It is my goal.

This is not to say a photographer cannot try different equipment and lenses, films or developers, if their work is of an experimental nature. 

A younger or new to film photographer has to experiment to get use to equipment and materials. Every photographer's goal is unique.

The ease at which a digital photographer can produce work has in my opinion cheapened the value of the digitally created image for the digital world compared to film photography in which the goal is to create a fine print. 

While many are creating good work digitally they are perhaps not being as well paid or rewarded as their old school film brethren or not being paid at all. (I make the assumption that the reader hopes to be able to sell their work or at least benefit from it)

The resurgence of traditional emulsion photography is no doubt a backlash caused by the soulless nature of digital photography. It is just a feeling that you have when working with film. A kind of cachet.

Getting back to producing a fine print the TLR photographer has the choice to make a traditional silver print in a darkroom or scanning the negative and making a pigment print on archival paper. Both approaches require a consistent work flow with a knowledge of equipment and material. 

Current practices and production workflow at Mama Mamiya is fairly consistent: 

- A clear idea of subject reflecting the vision and feelings of photographer.

- Knowing the workings of the Mamiya TLR camera, lenses and accessories. (find out what the exposure adjustment scale on the camera body really means) If you have the resources get the shutter  on your lenses cleaned and checked for accuracy. 

- Use the same film type all the time and get to know its quirks and quarks. In our case it is Ilford HP5.

- Use an incident light meter and select the most appropriate exposure for the subject and lighting. Use a filter to reflect your vision. Ansel seems to have been fond of the red filter as witnessed by the black skies in many of his pictures.

- Develop film using D76 or equivalent. I like Kodak Fixer with hardener and not Ilford's non-hardening varieties. A hardener cuts down on scratches when water is wiped from washed film with a squeegee but requires a longer wash time.

- Scan negative and make light/dark/contrast adjustments and do dust spotting. Send scanned file or negative to a photo lab for printing on traditional silver paper or to a digital lab for printing on archival paper using pigment inks. Alternatively you can set up your own darkroom and make silver prints or buy a photo printer. I recommend outsourcing in both instances as the do-it-yourself methods each come with their own  can of worms and can be both expensive and frustrating.

Like everything in life nothing is set in stone. This approach to TLR photography works for me. All photographers live and work in a myriad of situations often with limited resources. In my case I like to shoot as much as possible and amass a negative collection. 

It is very difficult for art photographers to exhibit, sell or have their work published. Maybe it is better to produce several really good fine prints a year for your own walls than giving up prematurely due to limited commercial success or lack of artistic fulfilment.

Following a consistent path has its own rewards. In the end you will have a large or small collection of fine prints. Your artistic vision and desires have been met in the value of the prints both to yourself and hopefully to others.



Tuesday, October 20, 2020

Fall Hosta


Fall hostas take on a lovely yellow hue which while stunning in colour also make a nice subject in black and white,

Mamiya C220 with 80mm lens. HP5


©PeteParsons

Saturday, October 17, 2020

Majorette

 


Going through my old negatives I came across this  studio photo taken in 1978 of my friend Christine in  her majorette costume. Christine loved having her  picture taken and I used her as a model several times afterward until we lost contact.

I was using my first Mamiya C220 with an 80mm  lens as it was the only medium format camera I had at the time. Tri-X and D-76

© Pete Parsons

Sunday, September 20, 2020

A Perfect Negative?



An older man enjoys reading his crumpled newspaper while sitting on a park bench in Halifax, Nova Scotia in 1976.

Tri-X and D-76 


© Peter N Parsons





When I was a beginning photographer I was always experimenting with different films, developers, filters, photographic papers etc. I spent days pouring over photo supply catalogs, magazines and books looking for the magic bullet that would make me a better photographer. 

In a way I was not unlike today's digital photographers who are always on the lookout for the latest cameras and lenses to make them a better photographer, hoping technology will produce better photographs. 

Back when I became a newspaper photographer in the early seventies the film of choice was Kodak Tri-X with a blazing ASA (later ISO) of 400. Tri-X was available in both 36 and 20 (later changed to 24) exposure rolls. We used the 20's for everyday work but carried the 36's for sports or big assignments The camera of choice was Nikon or maybe Pentax. At my newspaper the photographers were required to use their own equipment. I had a couple of Nikkormats with 35mm, 50mm and 105mm lens. The paper graciously provided a Metz flash and pool equipment including a 200mm lens and a Nikon F with motor drive.

We had two film developers, Kodak D-76 and fixer for everyday work and a developer called Acufine which allowed shooting Tri-X at 1000 ISO. We were always shooting hockey and basketball as well as other indoor sports in dimly lit arenas and gyms. To stop the sports action a shutter speed of at least 1/500 of a second combined with a wide open lens aperture was needed.  Acufine was a godsend for sports photography however picture were grainy, contrasty and with little detail in the shadows and highlights. But it did not matter because pictures in the newspaper were grainy, contrasty with blown out highlights anyway.

As stated we used Kodak D-76 and Kodak Rapid Fixer for our everyday developing. A new batch of developer was used at full strength. Development was the manufacture's recommended time and temperature using a chart. At first the developer was too strong and produced negatives that were both over developed and contrasty. Corrections were made, usually by adjusting the developing time by eyeballing your previous negative. The gallon size of developer was used until it was exhausted producing thin negatives which were hard to print.

We used a Kodak Ektamatic print processor which gave a quick, if not permanent print which was great for newspaper work.The Ekamatic prints could be also be fixed, washed and dried if a permanent photo was required

I found from time to time, but not often, I would produce what I believed was a perfect negative, sharp with a full range of midtones without blown out whites, good shadow detail but without any objectionable grain in an 8x10 print. Hard to get with 400 ISO speed 35mm film.

At first I believed it was a result of a good subject with a nice range of midtones and subdued contrast, ideal for skin tones with Tri-X. But a lot of subject had these attributes yet my negatives were not always excellent. I came to think bad negatives were because of often poor location conditions with which newspaper photographers worked.

Over time I became more consistent in my darkroom habits and bad negatives became rare. I am more careful with time/temperature and agitaion, using the D-76 1:1 and dumping it. D-76 has become the only film developer I use. (I have switched from Tri-X to Ilford HP-5 as it is very similar to Tri-X, more easily available and cheaper)* 

I am far from the best photographer in the world but I have become pleased with this film/developer combination as I believe it reflects my aspirations as a photographer.

Since I am no longer a newspaper but an enthusiast photographer I now have the  luxury of choosing my subjects carefully. I recommended rejecting subjects which are overly contrasty or may not photograph well (bright white skies) and being aware that camera exposure and film developing are at the heart of successful black and white film photography.

Another benefit of consistency in film choice and development is that it no longer becomes an issue. The photographer can then focus on subject selection and camera work and goals without much thought to what is now referred to as post. 

*As I have stated before here at Mama Mamiya we are only concerned with the use of the Mamiya TLR camera system with Ilford HP5 (exposed at recommended ISO 400) as our favorite film. Our developer is Kodak D-76 diluted 1:1 and dumped after every roll. We use stainless steel tanks and reels. We use the recommended developing time and agitation by gentle tank rotation every minute. I only get 16 rolls out of a gallon of D-76. A lot less than the old newspaper days but our negative are a hell of a lot more consistent.

Saturday, February 15, 2020

Daunting Tasks

Photos with descriptions.
One of the most daunting tasks many photographers neglect is to record serial numbers and take photos of their equipment for insurance purpose. Most professionals have to do this tedious chore as part of their business insurance package as gear is expensive and often financed.

The enthusiast Mamiya user usually collects their equipment, one piece at a time, sometimes over a period of years. They hope their camera stuff is insured through their home or tenant's insurance. 

If you stuff is stolen or lost it is a good idea to have ready for the insurer a list of your gear with serial numbers and photos. Please note: it is very difficult to put a value on used lenses and cameras which have been out of production for many years. You might have to pay a camera store to make valuations based on your photos alone.

Depending on the value of gear you might want to speak with your insurance agent anyway.

Think about it!